On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 03:04, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com> writes:
>> Personally, my utility for the old repo is not much (if it was anything
>> important, I wouldn't have relied on the unofficial repo). But we should
>> probably give a little bit of warning for folks that might want to
>> rebase or translate some old notes.
>
> Well, I guess the question is how much warning. I suggested O(1 week)
> but Robert seems to want O(1 year). As long as there's some agreed
> deadline, I'm not very picky about what it is.
I don't need to get rid of it *now*, but I agree a deadline is good.
How about we either say "when 9.1 is released", or we say "september
2011" because that's a year after we made the switch?
--
Magnus Hagander
Me: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
