On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 3:07 PM, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> wrote:
> It'd be nice to have as a side effect, but if not, IMHO this proposal
> could simply use a fixed buffer pool like all other slru.c callers until
> someone gets around to fixing that. Adding more GUC switches for this
> strikes me as overkill.
I agree.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company
