Re: Useless sort by - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: Useless sort by
Date
Msg-id AANLkTinjaB1Y_9U+pt1hF-GOHPyQuTaFDkRJRmyR=DUa@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Useless sort by  (<gnuoytr@rcn.com>)
List pgsql-performance
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 11:05 PM,  <gnuoytr@rcn.com> wrote:
> Spoken like a dyed in the wool COBOL coder.  The RM has no need for order; it's set based.  I've dabbled in PG for
sometime, and my sense is increasingly that PG developers are truly code oriented, not database (set) oriented. 

I'm struggling to think of an adequate response to this.  I think I'm
going to go with: huh?

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Scott Marlowe
Date:
Subject: Re: Useless sort by
Next
From: "mark"
Date:
Subject: Re: Using Between