On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 15:59, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> writes:
>> On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 21:19, David Jarvis <thangalin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> I prefer to_timestamp and to_date over the more verbose construct_timestamp.
>
>> Yeah, I agree with that.
>
> Those names are already taken. It will cause confusion (of both people
> and machines) if you try to overload them with this.
Fair enough. How about something like make_timestamp? It's at least
shorter and easier than construct :-)
--
Magnus Hagander
Me: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
