Re: auto-sizing wal_buffers - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: auto-sizing wal_buffers
Date
Msg-id AANLkTinhU9EEPGM29S+KH=qK4t-mLhBBNAaLCGQSx-4y@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: auto-sizing wal_buffers  (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>)
Responses Re: auto-sizing wal_buffers  (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>)
Re: auto-sizing wal_buffers  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 5:29 PM, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote:
> +1, I like the idea. Would it still be there to override if necessary?

Depends what people want to do.  We could make the default "0kB", and
define that to mean "auto-tune", or we could remove the parameter
altogether.  I think I was envisioning the latter, but if people are
hesitant to do that we could do the former instead.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Magnus Hagander
Date:
Subject: Re: auto-sizing wal_buffers
Next
From: Florian Pflug
Date:
Subject: Re: kill -KILL: What happens?