On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 7:51 AM, <gnuoytr@rcn.com> wrote:
> Not insulting, just amused bemusement. PG portrays itself as the best OS database, which it may well be. But it
doesso by stressing the row-by-agonizing-row approach to data. In other words, as just a record paradigm filestore for
COBOL/java/Ccoders. I was expecting more Relational oomph. As Dr. Codd says: "A Relational Model of Data for Large
SharedData Banks". Less code, more data.
So what, exactly, would give pgsql more relationally "oomph"?
Your assertion feels pretty hand wavy right now.
--
To understand recursion, one must first understand recursion.
