Re: BUG #5841: rank()+1 fails, 1+rank() succeeds - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: BUG #5841: rank()+1 fails, 1+rank() succeeds
Date
Msg-id AANLkTingY5a3unPNrgg+QfmOX0cU4VWrFtFUcCvvJOuX@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: BUG #5841: rank()+1 fails, 1+rank() succeeds  (jeff@biccard.com)
List pgsql-bugs
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 6:19 AM,  <jeff@biccard.com> wrote:
> Thanks for clarifying. I've submitted a note on the interactive version of
> the docs, and attached a small patch to make explicit that a window function
> is followed _immediately_ by an OVER clause, as the syntax[1] indicates.

I've committed the first hunk of this patch, as I think it's useful
and innocuous.  The second half looks like bad grammar to me.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: Giacomo Petillo
Date:
Subject: Bug in italian help of "pg_dumpall"
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: BUG #5837: PQstatus() fails to report lost connection