Re: pg_restore should accept multiple -t switches? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Fujii Masao
Subject Re: pg_restore should accept multiple -t switches?
Date
Msg-id AANLkTingQyZ9ED_zo9DN+CqHWs515gq7WVF0Rwpzwc8q@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_restore should accept multiple -t switches?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 11:00 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com> writes:
>> Is it worth allowing pg_restore to accept multiple -t
>> switches as well as pg_dump?
>
> It's on the TODO list already, no?

Thanks! I found it on the list and understood there are other many
restrictions in pg_restore's -t switch.

Regards,

-- 
Fujii Masao
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Greg Smith
Date:
Subject: Re: Patch to show individual statement latencies in pgbench output
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Regression tests versus the buildfarm environment