On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 9:36 AM, Dimitri Fontaine
<dimitri@2ndquadrant.fr> wrote:
> Do you want another patch version from me?
I'm looking at this patch and I'm confused. Why do we need this at
all? pg_read_binary_file() seems like it might be useful to somebody,
but I don't see what it has to do with extensions. And the rest of
this doesn't appear to provide any new functionality. The extension
mechanism hardly needs SQL-callable functions.
As a side note, this comment almost makes sense, but not quite:
+ /* Abuse knowledge that we're bytea and text are both varlena */
...but my real question is why any of this is necessary at all and
what it has to do with extensions.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
