Re: Proposal for 9.1: WAL streaming from WAL buffers - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Fujii Masao
Subject Re: Proposal for 9.1: WAL streaming from WAL buffers
Date
Msg-id AANLkTindHOnV5wmBublRA4FQMEqYwOEF_iLGH5oj1ujO@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Proposal for 9.1: WAL streaming from WAL buffers  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 7:55 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
>> What was the final decision on behavior if fsync=off?
>
> I'm not sure we made any decision, per se, but if you use fsync=off in
> combination with SR and experience an unexpected crash-and-reboot on
> the master, you will be sad.

True. But, without SR, an unexpected crash-and-reboot in the master
would make you sad ;) So I'm not sure whether we really need to take
action for the case of SR + fsync=off.

Regards,

-- 
Fujii Masao
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Takahiro Itagaki
Date:
Subject: Re: patch (for 9.1) string functions
Next
From: Pavel Golub
Date:
Subject: Re: keepalive in libpq using