Re: reducing NUMERIC size for 9.1, take two - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Brendan Jurd
Subject Re: reducing NUMERIC size for 9.1, take two
Date
Msg-id AANLkTincnsBoQHBP-FyqP2CBXinDZU=YD0o1iHGKQPDz@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to reducing NUMERIC size for 9.1, take two  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 31 July 2010 07:58, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> Here's a second version of the main patch, in which I have attempted
> to respond to Tom's concerns/suggestions.
>
> (There is still a small, side issue with numeric_maximum_size() which
> I plan to fix, but this patch is the good stuff.)
>

Applies fine, compiles fine, passes regression tests, and demonstrates
the same space reduction seen with the previous version of the patch.

Marking Ready for Committer.

Cheers,
BJ


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Two problems when using Postgresql8.3.7, Please help me!
Next
From: Boszormenyi Zoltan
Date:
Subject: ECPG dynamic cursor fix for UPDATE/DELETE ... WHERE CURRENT OF :curname