Re: multiple -f support - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: multiple -f support
Date
Msg-id AANLkTinc_aEL2kKddqXsZOBcvp6cO+vkxfH5kuvE=-5i@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: multiple -f support  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Responses Re: multiple -f support  (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>)
Re: multiple -f support  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Sun, Feb 6, 2011 at 11:16 AM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
> I assume having psql support multiple -f files is not a high priority or
> something we don't want.

IIRC, nobody objected to the basic concept, and it seems useful.  I
thought we were pretty close to committing something along those lines
at one point, actually.  I don't remember exactly where the wheels
came off.

Maybe a TODO?

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tomas Vondra
Date:
Subject: Re: keeping a timestamp of the last stats reset (for a db, table and function)
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: SAVEPOINTs and COMMIT performance