Re: SQL/MED estimated time of arrival? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Itagaki Takahiro
Subject Re: SQL/MED estimated time of arrival?
Date
Msg-id AANLkTina+9-FOZ3p2DTx1EfCginYeNj5b-ptLxi8O-tO@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: SQL/MED estimated time of arrival?  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: SQL/MED estimated time of arrival?
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 11:16, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> To have a chance of getting a significant portion
> of this into PostgreSQL 9.1, it really needs to be broken up into
> INDEPENDENTLY COMMITTABLE SUB-PATCHES.

Did we discuss about syntax-only patch is not acceptable because
it makes the head broken state at the previous commit-fest?
I think that's why the patch becomes so large.

So, our guideline to submit a large patch would be: * Split patch into commitable sub-patches (2000 lines each), * But
submita series of patches at once.
 

Am I understanding correctly?

-- 
Itagaki Takahiro


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: security hooks on object creation
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: SQL/MED estimated time of arrival?