Re: bg worker: patch 1 of 6 - permanent process - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: bg worker: patch 1 of 6 - permanent process
Date
Msg-id AANLkTin_98H58DNrPfjmo2M=k33ewYfiUAAYTm6yL9R+@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: bg worker: patch 1 of 6 - permanent process  (Markus Wanner <markus@bluegap.ch>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 3:40 PM, Markus Wanner <markus@bluegap.ch> wrote:
> On 08/26/2010 09:22 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>>
>> Not having to have a hard limit on the space for unconsumed messages?
>
> Ah, I see. However, spilling to disk is unwanted for the current use cases
> of imessages. Instead the sender needs to be able to deal with
> out-of-(that-specific-part-of-shared)-memory conditions.

Shared memory can be paged out, too, if it's not being used enough to
keep the OS from deciding to evict it.  And I/O to a mmap()'d file or
shared memory region can remain in RAM.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: bg worker: patch 1 of 6 - permanent process
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: refactoring comment.c