On Sun, Feb 6, 2011 at 1:23 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> I've not attempted to implement this idea, but offhand it looks like
> it would take a day or two's work, which seems well worthwhile to
> expend now in the hope of getting this feature right the first time.
>
> Comments?
The design you propose seems pretty good, and I don't think we can
commit this without this change. The scheduling implications are not
great, but since this seems like an important patch I guess we should
live with it, so +1.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
