Re: PL/pgSQL return value in after triggers - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: PL/pgSQL return value in after triggers
Date
Msg-id AANLkTinY_zeU85Po0=8Zm25f+z3P8tH0DtoJwqXYNXy9@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to PL/pgSQL return value in after triggers  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 12:07 PM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> wrote:
> PL/pgSQL trigger functions currently require a value to be returned,
> even though that value is not used for anything in case of a trigger
> fired AFTER.  I was wondering if we could relax that.  It would make
> things a bit more robust and produce clearer PL/pgSQL code.  The
> specific case I'm concerned about is that a trigger function could
> accidentally be run in a BEFORE trigger even though it was not meant for
> that.  It is common practice that trigger functions for AFTER triggers
> return NULL, which would have unpleasant effects if used in a BEFORE
> trigger.
>
> I think it is very uncommon to have the same function usable for BEFORE
> and AFTER triggers, so it would be valuable to have coding support
> specifically for AFTER triggers.  We could just allow RETURN without
> argument, or perhaps no RETURN at all.
>
> Comments?

It has bugged me for years that after triggers need to contain a
useless RETURN statement, but I'm not sure now is the time to go fix
it.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: pl/python custom exceptions for SPI
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: PL/pgSQL return value in after triggers