On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 07:55, Greg Smith <greg@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
<snip>
> a bit of work in userland, I don't see this even being justified as an INFO
> or LOG level message. Anytime I can script a SQL-level monitor for
> something that's easy to tie into Nagios or something, I greatly prefer that
> to log file scraping for it anyway.
+<INF-1>
Log files can be very useful for details, but they suck for noticing
the pattern in the first place :-)
<snip>
> verbosity of similar failure mode tests that follow it. Right now failure
> to acquire a lock is just not considered a log-worthy issue, and I agree
> that it's worth considering whether it should be.
Or should it perhaps be a per-table counter in pg_stat_user_tables,
given your statement above?
--
Magnus Hagander
Me: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
