Re: security label support, revised - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: security label support, revised
Date
Msg-id AANLkTinWA2yTa03i3xRscOxDTF4e1OW91OuXjWGA+rw_@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: security label support, revised  (KaiGai Kohei <kaigai@kaigai.gr.jp>)
Responses Re: security label support, revised
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 8:38 AM, KaiGai Kohei <kaigai@kaigai.gr.jp> wrote:
> Yes, if and when MAC-X and MAC-Y are installed, it is significant event
> for MAC-X to change X's label, so MAC-X may need to check special
> permissions. But it is a common event for MAC-Y and DAC, so they checks
> an appropriate permission to change one of the properties. Hoever, it
> does not mean we should not give any chance MAC-Y and DAC to check
> something.
>
> I'll revise my patch within a couple of days.

I have a feeling we are talking past each other.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: KaiGai Kohei
Date:
Subject: Re: security label support, revised
Next
From: Heikki Linnakangas
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_ctl emits strange warning message