On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 11:10 AM, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> This is clearly a response to issues raised about HS and not a new
> feature.
I don't find that clear at all. In fact, I find the exact opposition
position to be clear.
> It's also proposed in the most minimal way possible with
> respect for the current state of release. Why is you think I want to go
> to beta less quickly than anyone else?
We're already in beta. I said nothing about when you want to go to
beta or do anything else.
> There hasn't been anything more than a minor bug in weeks, so not really
> sure how you arrive at that the idea the code needs "stabilising".
I don't agree that there hasn't been anything more than a minor bug in
weeks. I arrive at the idea that the code needs stabilizing on the
basis of the fact that we keep finding new bugs.
> When people complain, I propose solutions. If you then object that the
> proposed solution is actually a new feature, that leaves us in a
> deadlock.
Not really. You're entitled to say what you think we should do and I
am entitled to say what I think we should do. I think we should wait
for 9.1.
...Robert
