Re: SQL/MED - core functionality - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: SQL/MED - core functionality
Date
Msg-id AANLkTinTiarYHrdH=oAh202reyNVzLudnM4xw9C8=5KM@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: SQL/MED - core functionality  (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: SQL/MED - core functionality  (Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki.takahiro@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 1:16 AM, Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On the other hand, I don't really see any advantage to allowing rules
>> on foreign tables - ever.  Unless there's some reason we really need
>> that, my gut feeling would be to rip it out and forget about it.
>
> views, updateable views?

We already have those.  They have their own relkind.  Why would we
need to duplicate that here?

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Instrument checkpoint sync calls
Next
From: Itagaki Takahiro
Date:
Subject: Re: SQL/MED - core functionality