On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 22:22, Thom Brown <thom@linux.com> wrote:
> On 1 September 2010 18:26, Joshua D. Drake <jd@commandprompt.com> wrote:
>> On Wed, 2010-09-01 at 13:04 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> "Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com> writes:
>>> > On Wed, 2010-09-01 at 11:29 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> >> As an example, do you think that anyone trying to read one of these
>>> >> pages on a cell-phone-sized screen is going to thank you for taking up
>>> >> some of his screen with this?
>>>
>>> > Not anymore than all the other stuff on the screen (like the search box,
>>> > header and excess space between the breadcrumb, the title and the fast
>>> > forward links).
>>>
>>> Uh, no, because that stuff is just at the top of the page; it doesn't
>>> stay there while you scroll down.
>>
>> You may have missed the part where I said, it didn't move for me. :D
>>
>> Anyway, Thom is removing it so it doesn't really matter.
>>
>> JD
>
> I'm coming round to the idea that if we wanted such a table of
> contents, we'd generate it on the page when building the docs rather
> than running some ECMAScript. I've already got a basic contents thing
Yes, definite +1 on that if you can make that work.
> showing on my version of the docs (see
> http://pgweb.darkixion.com:8081/docs/9.0/static/functions-xml.html ),
> but I'm not happy with it. It looks out of place and there doesn't
> seem to be any appropriate place to put the link to show it.
(once you're happy with it, of course)
--
Magnus Hagander
Me: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
