Re: Stefan's bug (was: max_standby_delay considered harmful) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: Stefan's bug (was: max_standby_delay considered harmful)
Date
Msg-id AANLkTinMns7IZ9EI120pgDDtRgy9dyN_2VEo1E-uzfPL@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Stefan's bug (was: max_standby_delay considered harmful)  (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 7:38 AM, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-05-17 at 07:33 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
>> I would
>> prefer that we focus on the technical issues here rather than who
>> wrote the patch.
>
> There are three patches now from 2 authors. I agree we should focus on
> the technical issues, but which issues, in which patch? If Masao had
> accepted your version he would not have written another, would he?

He wrote his version first.  I reviewed it and submitted a simplified
version.  He reviewed mine and submitted an updated version that
addresses an additional possible issue, which is currently under
discussion.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Fujii Masao
Date:
Subject: Re: Stefan's bug (was: max_standby_delay considered harmful)
Next
From: Simon Riggs
Date:
Subject: Re: Stefan's bug (was: max_standby_delay considered harmful)