2010/6/24 Joshua D. Drake <jd@commandprompt.com>:
> On Thu, 2010-06-24 at 22:18 +0100, Dave Page wrote:
>
>> > I have no problem with him trying to protect his hard earned work. I
>> > just think he is trying to solve the wrong problem.
>>
>> It's a real problem faced by many businesses and solved by most
>> commercial DBMSs. Of course, it's basically impossible to solve in the
>> Open Source world, as there's nowhere to hide a key or obfuscation
>> algorithm. If akp geek is able to use EnterpriseDB builds of Postgres,
>> then he may want to look at PL/Secure, which will obfuscate his
>> pl/pgsql code:
>>
>> http://www.enterprisedb.com/products/pl_secure_standard_server.do
>
> That's interesting... does it just turn it into bytecode?
>
probably it doesn't - but it is a black box. So some minimal
protection is possible :)
Pavel
> Joshua D. Drake
>
>>
>
> --
> PostgreSQL.org Major Contributor
> Command Prompt, Inc: http://www.commandprompt.com/ - 509.416.6579
> Consulting, Training, Support, Custom Development, Engineering
>
>
