Re: Suggested changes to Book pages - Mailing list pgsql-www

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: Suggested changes to Book pages
Date
Msg-id AANLkTinLczijkPprSOxyzFCE6kfsbpsTCa88kvGtpxyd@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Suggested changes to Book pages  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Responses Re: Suggested changes to Book pages  (Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume@lelarge.info>)
List pgsql-www
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 5:47 PM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> wrote:
> On ons, 2010-11-10 at 14:42 -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
>> I think marking version numbers for each book is a good idea, though I
>> would be inclined to get more specific than 7/8/9.
>
> How do you know which exact version a particular book covers?  Isn't
> mentioned the date of publication a more neutral and robust approach?

I can't imagine that figuring out the versions the book covers is all
that hard, and it seems a lot more useful than just the publication
date, although of course we could have both.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


pgsql-www by date:

Previous
From: Simon Riggs
Date:
Subject: Re: Suggested changes to Book pages
Next
From: Guillaume Lelarge
Date:
Subject: Re: Suggested changes to Book pages