On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 1:38 PM, Heikki Linnakangas
<heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> I think a different name would help. The best idea I can come up with
>> on the spur of the moment is "allow_standby_queries", but I'm not sure
>> that can't be improved on. Comments?
>
> One objection to that name is that it also works during archive
> recovery, like during PITR, which is not a standby server. But that's
> probably a rare use case.
Gee, I think of it as a standby regardless of whether it's created
using archiving or SR. Do we not have a generic term that covers both
cases?
> +1 on changing it to something.
Boy, my blog post is going to have a darn short shelf life (see the
last paragraph).
http://rhaas.blogspot.com/2010/04/write-ahead-logging-in-postgresql-90.html
...Robert
