Re: Specification for Trusted PLs? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: Specification for Trusted PLs?
Date
Msg-id AANLkTinLAh5uFwJ5E4_K8JFrJK2TTTsVmBSdh1w8NJex@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Specification for Trusted PLs?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Specification for Trusted PLs?
Re: Specification for Trusted PLs?
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 2:21 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
>> So... can we get back to coming up with a reasonable
>> definition,
>
> (1) no access to system calls (including file and network I/O)
>
> (2) no access to process memory, other than variables defined within the
> PL.
>
> What else?

Doesn't subvert the general PostgreSQL security mechanisms?  Not sure
how to formulate that.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Specification for Trusted PLs?
Next
From: "Greg Sabino Mullane"
Date:
Subject: Re: Specification for Trusted PLs?