On 18 August 2010 22:45, Kevin Grittner <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov> wrote:
> At the close of the 2010-07 CommitFest, the numbers were:
>
> 72 patches were submitted
> 3 patches were withdrawn (deleted) by their authors
> 14 patches were moved to CommitFest 2010-09
> --
> 55 patches in CommitFest 2010-07
> --
> 3 committed to 9.0
> --
> 52 patches for 9.1
> --
> 1 rejected
> 20 returned with feedback
> 31 committed for 9.1
>
> When we hit the end of the allotted time, I moved the last two
> patches to the next CF, for want of a better idea for disposition.
> One is "Ready for Committer" with an author who is a committer. The
> other is my WiP patch for serializable transactions -- there's a lot
> to review and the reviewer had unexpected demands on his time during
> the CF; he said he'll continue work on that outside the CF.
>
> -Kevin
>
>
> At the end of week four:
>
>> 72 patches were submitted
>> 3 patches were withdrawn (deleted) by their authors
>> 12 patches were moved to CommitFest 2010-09
>> --
>> 57 patches in CommitFest 2010-07
>> --
>> 3 committed to 9.0
>> --
>> 54 patches for 9.1
>> --
>> 1 rejected
>> 18 returned with feedback
>> 28 committed for 9.1
>> --
>> 47 disposed
>> --
>> 7 pending
>> 2 ready for committer
>> --
>> 5 will still need reviewer attention
>> 1 waiting on author to respond to review
>> --
>> 4 patches need review now and have a reviewer assigned
So did the materialized views patch not get submitted?
--
Thom Brown
Twitter: @darkixion
IRC (freenode): dark_ixion
Registered Linux user: #516935
