On 2 February 2011 05:41, Scott Marlowe <scott.marlowe@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I wouldn't increase index fill factor as an optimisation, unless you
>> had the unusual situation of having very static data in the table.
>
> That makes no sense whatsoever. You decrease fill factor (not
> increase btw) so there will be some space for future updates. If he's
> getting bloat it may well help quite a bit to have a lower than 100%
> fill factor.
As I said, it depends on the profile of the data. Heavily or randomly
updated tables will benefit from reducing *index* fillfactor - it will
reduce index fragmentation. OTOH, indexes for static data can have
their fillfactors increased to 100% from the default of 90% without
consequence.
--
Regards,
Peter Geoghegan
