On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 5:16 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
>> On 08/11/2010 04:47 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> I prefer the change-the-default approach mainly because it wouldn't
>>> require any documentation,
>
>> Yeah. The other advantage is that we would not need to wait until we had
>> got everyone to update their versions of the buildfarm code.
>
> Um. That's actually a pretty darn strong point, considering how
> slow some buildfarm owners are to update the script :-(
Well, it's a convenient time to get such changes in, now, because
folks are going to need to update their scripts rather soon as a
consequence of the Git migration :-).
--
http://linuxfinances.info/info/linuxdistributions.html
