Re: refactoring comment.c - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: refactoring comment.c
Date
Msg-id AANLkTin9Y4TkfxxJSfsnkPiH0ovJkXBVJV2Sk6UxQfco@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: refactoring comment.c  (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 12:26 PM, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> I understand the concept and it seems like it might work. Not too keen
> on pretending a noun is a verb. That leads to erroring.
>
> <verb> SECURITY LABEL? verb = CREATE, ADD, ...
>
> Can't objects have more than one label?
>
> How will you set default security labels on objects?
>
> Where do you define labels?
>
> Will there be a new privilege to define this? Presumably object owners
> would not be able to set that themselves, otherwise you could create an
> object, add a security label to it and then use it to see other things
> at that level.

Uh, these are all good questions, but I think they'd be more
appropriate on the thread about the security label patch, to which I
linked in my previous email.  Many of them have already been discussed
there.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Simon Riggs
Date:
Subject: Re: refactoring comment.c
Next
From: Pavel Stehule
Date:
Subject: Re: Initial review of xslt with no limits patch