Re: warning message in standby - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: warning message in standby
Date
Msg-id AANLkTin1PYG9-U0a8RddAZaLkweOaJVNj4heyF2m4NYV@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: warning message in standby  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: warning message in standby  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 10:08 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
>> Magnus Hagander wrote:
>>> It means that we can't prevent people from configuring their tools to
>>> ignore important warning. We can't prevent them rom ignoring ERROR or
>>> FATAL either...
>
>> My point is that most tools are going to look at the tag first to
>> determine the severity of the message, and might even have
>> log_min_messages set to ignore warnings.
>
> Why is this discussion based on the idea that we have to cater to
> incorrectly written log-filtering apps?
>
> The correct log level for this message is LOG.  End of discussion.

Why?

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: warning message in standby
Next
From: "Jehan-Guillaume (ioguix) de Rorthais"
Date:
Subject: Re: Typo in plperl doc ?