On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 12:36 PM, David E. Wheeler <david@kineticode.com> wrote:
> On Jun 28, 2010, at 12:10 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>
>>> While I would personally prefer to have an operator for the slicing
>>> opeeration, I'm not willing to spend time arguing about it. So, +1 to
>>> implement the subset operation as the function slice(), and defer having
>>> an operator until later.
>>
>> Yeah, I think the consensus is to avoid picking an operator name at all.
>> "slice()" is OK by me.
>
> Will this be done for Beta 3?
You forgot to attach the patch. :-)
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company
