On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 5:00 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> So maybe Aidan's got a good idea here. It would sure be a lot easier
> to shoehorn checksum checking in as an optional feature if the checksums
> were kept someplace else.
Would it? I thought the only problem was the hint bits being set
behind the checksummers back. That'll still happen even if it's
written to a different place.
--
greg
