Re: Stefan's bug (was: max_standby_delay considered harmful) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Fujii Masao
Subject Re: Stefan's bug (was: max_standby_delay considered harmful)
Date
Msg-id AANLkTimxPtlmyIzglADRZ6Pv-spee401YrudVS8Zhuy6@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Stefan's bug (was: max_standby_delay considered harmful)  (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>)
Responses Re: Stefan's bug (was: max_standby_delay considered harmful)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 9:01 PM, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>> (1)
>> Smart or fast shutdown requested in PM_STARTUP state always removes
>> the backup_label file if it exists. But it might be still required
>> for subsequent recovery. I changed your patch so that additionally
>> the postmaster skips deleting the backup_label in that case.
>
> Don't like the name NeedBackupLabel seems too specific. That really
> corresponds to "we were in recovery". We should have a couple of
> super-states that correspond to am in recovery/am not in recovery so we
> can drive it from that.

ISTM that we can use XLogCtl->SharedRecoveryInProgress for that.
Is this OK?

Regards,

-- 
Fujii Masao
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Fujii Masao
Date:
Subject: Re: Stefan's bug (was: max_standby_delay considered harmful)
Next
From: Greg Stark
Date:
Subject: Re: including PID or backend ID in relpath of temp rels