On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 11:21 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> I agree with Robert that that is an utterly horrid, broken concept.
That's a little stronger than what I said, though the same general idea.
> Just to point out one concrete problem: the postmaster reads
> postgresql.conf too, so it would have to do this as well in order to
> parse postgresql.conf correctly.
This is an even more serious problem than what I was pointing out.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
