On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 6:48 AM, Marko Tiikkaja
<marko.tiikkaja@cs.helsinki.fi> wrote:
> On 7/26/10 1:44 PM +0300, Fujii Masao wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 6:36 PM, Yeb Havinga<yebhavinga@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> I wasn't entirely clear. My suggestion was to have only
>>>
>>> acknowledge_commit = {no|recv|fsync|replay}
>>>
>>> instead of
>>>
>>> replication_mode = {async|recv|fsync|replay}
>>
>> Okay, I'll change the patch accordingly.
>
> For what it's worth, I think replication_mode is a lot clearer.
> Acknowledge_commit sounds like it would do something similar to
> asynchronous_commit.
I agree.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company
