Re: What happened to SSL_CIPHERS? - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: What happened to SSL_CIPHERS?
Date
Msg-id AANLkTimtEJJzLMcbuMjYOeqAqmX7Ja9dYxnVw-akPJrZ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: What happened to SSL_CIPHERS?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-bugs
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 1:56 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>=A0But for user-facing parameters I agree we should do it,
> and ssl_ciphers is one of those.

+1.

> In any case, a doc patch would be the right thing for the back branches.

+1.

--=20
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: "Kevin Grittner"
Date:
Subject: Re: [PERFORM] typoed column name, but postgres didn't grump
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [PERFORM] typoed column name, but postgres didn't grump