Re: Report: removing the inconsistencies in our CVS->git conversion - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: Report: removing the inconsistencies in our CVS->git conversion
Date
Msg-id AANLkTimsp2bvJ5kaJfGT4jJ=ku_dF7hq+55ukXNO0MhL@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Report: removing the inconsistencies in our CVS->git conversion  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Report: removing the inconsistencies in our CVS->git conversion
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 12:23 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
>> We're not planning to delete the CVS repository, are we?
>
> Not in the short term, but I'd like to think that the git repository
> will contain everything of conceivable interest.

Hmm, OK.  That's never really been one of my goals.  :-)

I want a good, clean, complete history in git, but ancient partial
branches are below my threshold for caring.  But if you feel it's
useful, we can keep the tag - I don't care enough to argue about it.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: bg worker: patch 1 of 6 - permanent process
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Report: removing the inconsistencies in our CVS->git conversion