Re: comment needs to be updated for HS? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Fujii Masao
Subject Re: comment needs to be updated for HS?
Date
Msg-id AANLkTimr9g3QNq1T0d-HwvaJl_krFSoZaESZkAm9rj6k@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to comment needs to be updated for HS?  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: comment needs to be updated for HS?
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 4:20 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> postmaster.c contains the following comment just above the definition
> of PMState.  It appears to be out of date:
>
>  * After reaching a consistent point in WAL redo, startup process signals
>  * us again, and we switch to PM_RECOVERY_CONSISTENT state. There's currently
>  * no difference between PM_RECOVERY and PM_RECOVERY_CONSISTENT, but we
>  * could start accepting connections to perform read-only queries at this
>  * point, if we had the infrastructure to do that.

But the first sentence of the above seems to be correct and helpful. No?

Regards,

--
Fujii Masao
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Fujii Masao
Date:
Subject: Re: weird hang while running in HS mode
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: multibyte charater set in levenshtein function