On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 2:01 PM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> wrote:
> On fre, 2010-05-28 at 00:46 +0900, Tatsuo Ishii wrote:
>> > I don't know about Japanese, but the locale approach works just fine for
>> > other agglutinative languages. I would rather suspect that it is the
>> > trigram approach that might be rather useless for such languages,
>> > because you are going to get a lot of similarity hits for the affixes.
>>
>> I'm not sure what you mean by "affixes". But I will explain...
>>
>> A Japanese sentence consists of words. Problem is, each word is not
>> separated by space (agglutinative). So most text tools such as text
>> search need preprocess which finds word boundaries by looking up
>> dictionaries (and smart grammer analysis routine). In the process
>> "affixes" can be determined and perhaps removed from the target word
>> group to be used for text search (note that removing affixes is no
>> relevant to locale). Once we get space separated sentence, it can be
>> processed by text search or by pg_trgm just same as Engligh. (Note
>> that these preprocessing are done outside PostgreSQL world). The
>> difference is just the "word" can be consists of non ASCII letters.
>
> I think the problem at hand has nothing at all to do with agglutination
> or CJK-specific issues. You will get the same problem with other
> languages *if* you set a locale that does not adequately support the
> characters in use. E.g., Russian with locale C and encoding UTF8:
>
> select similarity(E'\u0441\u043B\u043E\u043D', E'\u0441\u043B\u043E
> \u043D\u044B');
> similarity
> ────────────
> NaN
> (1 row)
What I can't help wondering as I'm reading this discussion is -
Tatsuo-san said upthread that he has a problem with pg_trgm that he
does not have with full text search. So what is full text search
doing differently than pg_trgm?
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company
