Re: Report: removing the inconsistencies in our CVS->git conversion - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Magnus Hagander
Subject Re: Report: removing the inconsistencies in our CVS->git conversion
Date
Msg-id AANLkTimj1ko_jLdZkE=7LYtnGjOo-3X1n8nispUBMzZ7@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Report: removing the inconsistencies in our CVS->git conversion  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Report: removing the inconsistencies in our CVS->git conversion
List pgsql-hackers
On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 00:06, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> writes:
>> On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 23:01, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>>> git branch -D unlabeled-1.44.2
>>> git branch -D unlabeled-1.51.2
>>> git branch -D unlabeled-1.59.2
>>> git branch -D unlabeled-1.87.2
>>> git branch -D unlabeled-1.90.2
>>>
>>> You should not need any of the above; I don't see those being generated
>>> anymore with the cleanup script in place.
>
>> I see them - at least the script didn't give an error when it ran, but
>> said it had deleted them.
>
> [ scratches head ... ]  That's weird.  We probably ought to figure out
> why you and I are getting different results.  I wonder if there's some
> other discrepancy in the anoncvs pull?

Could be.


> Anyway, if what you have up at
> http://github.com/mhagander/pggit_migrate
> is current, I can try to reproduce your results here.

It is - I just double-checked that.

--
 Magnus Hagander
 Me: http://www.hagander.net/
 Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Report: removing the inconsistencies in our CVS->git conversion
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Report: removing the inconsistencies in our CVS->git conversion