Re: Did we really want to force an initdb in beta2? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Dave Page
Subject Re: Did we really want to force an initdb in beta2?
Date
Msg-id AANLkTimc6f2ucWAfHi-4ilP29cQhIhnJCGJJsVl3pPLj@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Did we really want to force an initdb in beta2?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 7:30 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org> writes:
>> On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 4:30 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>>> XLOG_PAGE_MAGIC --- bump on incompatible change in WAL contents
>
>> How can I get that from an existing data directory? I don't see it in
>> pg_controldata output (unless it has a non-obvious alias).
>
> You'd need to pull it out of one of the WAL files.  I'm not sure it's
> worth the trouble ...

Urgh, no. Probably not.


--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Did we really want to force an initdb in beta2?
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix leaky VIEWs for RLS