Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Make S_IRGRP etc available in mingw builds as well as MSVC. - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Magnus Hagander
Subject Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Make S_IRGRP etc available in mingw builds as well as MSVC.
Date
Msg-id AANLkTimc+9AHFngDvaOoz-5=2=kdH6ts2X4-=_hO_ZFT@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Make S_IRGRP etc available in mingw builds as well as MSVC.  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Make S_IRGRP etc available in mingw builds as well as MSVC.  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 19:54, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
>> On 12/12/2010 01:43 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> (Hm, I wonder whether BCC defines them either...)
>
>> Is anyone building the client stuff with BCC any more? I don't recall
>> having heard of anyone doing so for quite some years.
>
> It's a fair question.  We could clean up some of these messy ifdefs
> if we dropped support for that combination.  I assume that an MSVC-built
> libpq.dll would still work for Borland users, no?

The dynamic one, yes. Static linked one, no.

IIRC I suggest desupporting it every now and then and get voted down
;) And quite often we have someone showing up around the x.y.2 release
to clean it up so it works again...

--
 Magnus Hagander
 Me: http://www.hagander.net/
 Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Make S_IRGRP etc available in mingw builds as well as MSVC.
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Make S_IRGRP etc available in mingw builds as well as MSVC.