Re: raid10 write performance - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Dave Crooke
Subject Re: raid10 write performance
Date
Msg-id AANLkTimaA0LqPAmSi--K1FkQqPXqKLpFLyhucDMI4y-w@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: raid10 write performance  (Karl Denninger <karl@denninger.net>)
List pgsql-performance
Of course, no backup strategy is complete without testing a full restore onto bare hardware :-)

On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 9:29 AM, Karl Denninger <karl@denninger.net> wrote:
Justin Graf wrote:
On 6/22/2010 4:31 AM, Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz wrote: 
Would moving WAL dir to separate disk help potentially ?     
Yes it can have a big impact.
WAL on a separate spindle will make a HUGE difference in performance.  TPS rates frequently double OR BETTER with WAL on a dedicated spindle.

Strongly recommended.

Be aware that you must pay CLOSE ATTENTION to your backup strategy if WAL is on a different physical disk.  Snapshotting the data disk where WAL is on a separate spindle and backing it up **WILL NOT WORK** and **WILL** result in an non-restoreable backup.

The manual discusses this but it's easy to miss.... don't or you'll get a NASTY surprise if something goes wrong.....

-- Karl


--
Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance


pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Karl Denninger
Date:
Subject: Re: raid10 write performance
Next
From: Scott Carey
Date:
Subject: Re: raid10 write performance