On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 5:03 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
>> On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 5:00 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>>> Okay, I'm confused. This patch removed an operator named %, which AFAIK
>>> was not controversial. The problematic operator is => no?
>
>> It used to be =>
>
> Nevermind, I *am* confused. Obviously time to knock off for the day;
> my brain's fried.
Just as long as you don't ask to have it changed again. :-)
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company
