Re: pg_dump -X - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: pg_dump -X
Date
Msg-id AANLkTimXnA_sP_thuocHTfQn_U4evKZpr5ugovreTTmN@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_dump -X  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Responses Re: pg_dump -X
List pgsql-hackers
On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 12:56 AM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
>> Presumably the point of deprecating the feature is that we'd
>> eventually remove it.  If 4 major releases isn't long enough, what is?
>
> Good point.

Unless there are further objections, I think we should go ahead and remove this.

If there ARE further objections, then please say what release you
think it would be OK to remove it in, or why you think it's worth
keeping around indefinitely given that the last version in which it
was documented is now EOL.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Avoiding repeated ON COMMIT truncation for temporary tables
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: Better estimates of index correlation