Re: First patch proposal - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alastair Turner
Subject Re: First patch proposal
Date
Msg-id AANLkTimWzHv5f_f+f20k=2hP9UG2kX65hC=kETEaNc6y@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: First patch proposal  (Hitoshi Harada <umi.tanuki@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: First patch proposal
Re: First patch proposal
List pgsql-hackers
Excerpt from Hitoshi Harada <umi.tanuki@gmail.com> - Thu, Oct 14, 2010
at 4:32 PM:
> Just for information, did you pick this topic from TODO
> list? If so, could you attach links to the entry or to some related
> former thread? And in general it is encouraged that you'd better send
> one feature per a patch, in order for it to be reviewed and committed
> easily, rather than going all the three you mentioned above.
>
It isn't a TODO item, or related to any previous thread I could find.
When I'm making the changes I'll bear in mind the preference for
multiple small patches. I have a feeling that the changes would be to
the logic structure and that it wouldn't be possible to separate the
implementation of each check though.

Regards

Bell.


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Dimitri Fontaine
Date:
Subject: Re: SQL command to edit postgresql.conf, with comments
Next
From: David Newall
Date:
Subject: Re: [BUGS] rollback to savepoint leads to transaction already in progress