On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 5:49 PM, Greg Smith <greg@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> I was never arguing in favor of touching anything in the back branches; if
> you recall I didn't even voice an opinion here until I got concerned about
> too many changes happening in them. I think a proper fix in 9.0 combined
> with a release notes comment noting the old/new behavior, so it's clear what
> was broken in the old versions, would be quite enough here.
OK, commit done in head, with a note that we're deliberately not
touching the back-branches and should release-note the change. Open
item removed, also.
> Thanks for following this through, I think it's a useful small bit to get
> sorted out fully.
yw
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company
