On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 5:29 PM, Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com> wrote:
> The new git repository will have different SHA1s for all of the commits,
> so any old SHA1s will be useless without the old repository.
>
> Hopefully nobody used links to specific commits (or SHA1s) pointing to
> the old git repository for anything important. But I found myself doing
> so occasionally for unimportant things (if it was important, I included
> the date as a safeguard) -- so I assume a few other people did, as well.
>
> Would it be worth keeping the old git repository around in a read-only
> mode, just in case people have links/SHA1s floating around for it?
Perhaps "http://git.postgresql.org/gitweb?p=postgresql-before-official-git-migration.git;a=summary"
--
http://linuxfinances.info/info/linuxdistributions.html
