On 21 June 2010 16:12, David Fetter <david@fetter.org> wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 01:34:37PM +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>> On Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 02:42, Joshua D. Drake <jd@commandprompt.com> wrote:
>> > On Fri, 2010-06-18 at 17:22 -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:
>> >> > "The PostgreSQL Global Development Team is proud to announce
>> >> > the release of version 9.0. "
>> >> >
>> >> > Maybe "PostgreSQL 9.0" instead of "version 9.0"?
>> >>
>> >> Yeah, tried that too, it seemed repetitive. You don't think so?
>> >
>> > O.k. this may not fly but:
>> >
>> > The PostgreSQL Global Development Group (that is who we are, not
>> > team) is proud to announce the release of 9.
>>
>> Can we please *not* call it 9, but stick to 9.0?
>
> Another way to deal with this would be to make the next one 10, the
> following one 11, etc., etc. :)
>
You mean we're not going to have PostgreSQL X? Ah, but then it might
get shortened to PGX, and then we'd be in a kerfuffle. ;)
Thom
